Social Darwinism and Business Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Social Darwinism and Business Ethics - Essay Example Apart from the practical issues in business ethics like corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, stakeholder concept etc there area also philosophical issues conflicting with the nature of business. One of the most important issues among them is 'Social Darwinism'. The encyclopedia Britannica defines Social Darwinism as "the theory that persons, groups, and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin had perceived in plants and animals in nature". The essential similarity between Social Darwinism and the nature of business is the term 'competition'. It is competition that drives progress. The alleged propounder of Social Darwinism, the late Victorian English philosopher Herbert Spencer coined the term 'survival of the fittest' to society, inspired by the scientific support from Darwin's work. This led to the belief that the weak exist solely for exploitation by the strong. Critics think Social Darwinism is to be blamed for issues like the eugenic programs of nineteenth century, the Nazi holocaust, imperialism, racism etc. The eighteenth century philosopher Kant had a viewpoint quite similar to the social Darwinists, but much more superior. He argued that the theory of evolution was actually a step backwards in theoretical analysis of the species and illogical.

Communication Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 19

Communication - Essay Example This paper discusses this with certain examples. Let’s suppose a workplace in which a male employee is talking to a female employee. The two are in some sort of an argument over a matter related to work. The male employee finally says, â€Å"You know what? I give up. No man can win an argument from a woman.† The female employee becomes offensive and says, â€Å"So you suggest I am right because I am a woman? Not because what I am saying is actually right?† She snaps at the male employee and walks out of the room. This explains how the use of sexist language can serve as a barrier to communication. Now let’s suppose a scenario in which two colleagues are dining together at the cafeteria. One of them is an Indian and the other is an American. The two are having gossip and a good time together. The American colleague orders a Pizza for himself and asks the Indian colleague what he would like to have. The Indian colleague replies, â€Å"I would like to have chicken curry.† Suddenly, the American colleague says, â€Å"Now I know why you Indians smell like curry.† The Indian colleague replies, â€Å"For the same reason that you Americans are so obese.† Seeds of dislike are planted in the hearts of both for each other. Now let’s suppose a situation in which two friends are attending a party. One of them is straight while the other is a gay. The former doesn’t know the homosexual orientation of the latter. The straight guy suggests the gay, â€Å"Hey look, why don’t you pair up with that blonde in the skirt! She’s pretty.† The gay guy manages to change the topic. The straight guy again suggests a suitable match. The gay guy finally says, â€Å"I’m into men†¦OK?† The straight guy says, â€Å"Is that why you’re with me? OMG! All this while, I’ve been with a fag!† The gay guy thinks he has heard enough, and snaps out. Concluding, sexist, racist, and homophobic